More than a decade after shark mislabeling was first highlighted in Brazil (1), generic commercial names such as caçao (2–4), galeos (5), rock salmon and huss (6), flake (7), palombo (8), tollo, and cazón (9) continue to obscure shark species identity worldwide. DNA-based surveys repeatedly reveal that products sold under these names comprise multiple shark species, including threatened and internationally regulated taxa (2–12). Although these commercial names differ among countries, they produce the same outcome: species identity is progressively lost as shark products move from capture to consumption, precisely where fisheries management, wildlife trade regulation, sustainability claims, and informed consumer choice depend on it.
Trending
- 2027 Oscars Best Supporting Actress Predictions
- Sudoku 7,416 hard
- Trump orders Pentagon to scrap modern jet launching tech on new US aircraft carrier and revert to steam catapults – as it happened | Trump administration
- After 2 Plasma Donor Deaths, Company Pauses Clinics in Canada
- Visa Restrictions Push Nigerians to New Holiday Destinations – THISDAYLIVE
- Trump declares 100 percent tariffs on many drones and all aircraft parts
- Nigel Farage set for decisive but arguably empty victory in Clacton | Politics
- Shark governance requires species identity | Science
