More than a decade after shark mislabeling was first highlighted in Brazil (1), generic commercial names such as caçao (2–4), galeos (5), rock salmon and huss (6), flake (7), palombo (8), tollo, and cazón (9) continue to obscure shark species identity worldwide. DNA-based surveys repeatedly reveal that products sold under these names comprise multiple shark species, including threatened and internationally regulated taxa (2–12). Although these commercial names differ among countries, they produce the same outcome: species identity is progressively lost as shark products move from capture to consumption, precisely where fisheries management, wildlife trade regulation, sustainability claims, and informed consumer choice depend on it.
Trending
- AFC leads investment in Dangote Refinery’s $2.5bn private placement
- Super League: Leaders Leeds Rhinos suffer first home defeat of season as Leigh Leopards claim surprise 20-16 win at Headingley | Rugby League News
- Mine by Adam Ouston review – novel told in a single sentence is a hallucinatory reading experience | Fiction
- Most child sexual abuses involve fathers, daughters — Edo govt
- Why Osun’s election matters for Nigeria’s 2027 vote | News
- Nigel Farage says he won’t attend count in Clacton byelection against Count Binface – UK politics live | Politics
- Stakeholders Seek Tough Labour Laws to Protect Passengers – THISDAYLIVE
- Flock says its new tool will help identify police abuse, but hasn’t explained how it works
